×
Warning message
The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.Yavapai County Zoning and Subdivisions Assessment Report
Review the draft Assessment Report!
The window for the TAG’s review of the Assessment Report will close on August 15th!
Your input at this stage will help the consultant team of Logan Simpson to finalize the Assessment Report so that it can be presented at a joint work session of the Board of Supervisors and Planning and Zoning Commission on Thursday October 23rd at 9am.
How to give input? As indicated on the green bar below, you can click anywhere on the document to comment. You do not need to register/sign in to provide comments. However, you will be asked to provide your name and email the first time you comment (if you come back at another time, you'll have to add your name and address again). Select "Summary" to select the specific section # on which you want to comment.
bubble to view comments.
Loading Glossary… Add comment
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 9:05PM on page 61
Question
Would this be "Yavapai County Development Services (YCDS)" or "Development Services (YCDS)?"
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 9:02PM on page 61
Question
Replace with ordinance?
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 9:01PM on page 59
Comment
Storage containers are not designed for habitable space, converting/modifying can be costly and requires an engineer's seal.
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 8:37PM on page 29
Question
I've heard of HOA requirements for specific landscaping, is this something we have included in the past? How and who will regulate these requirements? Would this be a recommendation to the public?
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 8:27PM on page 27
Comment
Clarify with Building Safety - Covered Patios/Covered Decks, previously BS would stay away from "porch."
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 8:18PM on page 26
Comment
Temp dwellings are allowed after SFR is issued, they have two years with one renewal up to twelve months. There are temps that expire after year two or three without any signs of construction. Temp dwellings are movable, secondary dwelling or ADU would be secured to a foundation (not temporary). I think some type of timeframe would be advisable as Mr. Bourdon stated, or there may be many properties with an ADU and no SFR.
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 8:02PM on page 21
Question
Will this be in a specific zone? What would minimum parcel size be? Will lot coverage be the only limiting factor? Multiple addresses, septic systems, etc.?
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 7:51PM on page 16
Question
Will measurement standards take Building Safety dimensions into consideration? Calculating square footages to exterior wall, height of structure, etc.?
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 7:33PM on page 14
Comment
Consolidation and consolidated both used in one sentence, feels redundant, possible change?
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 7:07PM on page 7
Technical Edit
Remove "that"
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 6:57PM on page 5
Technical Edit
"when" instead of "are"
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 6:43PM on page 5
Suggested Revision
The last sentence could be reworded to make more sense. If using "other public input" would that be clarified?
Tara Aug 21 2025 at 6:33PM on page 5
Technical Edit
Add comma.
Warren Colvin, CBO Aug 21 2025 at 4:01PM on page 59
Comment
See my other comments.
Warren Colvin, CBO Aug 21 2025 at 4:00PM on page 57
Comment
This should be left up to the fire districts , individual home owners or HOA.
Warren Colvin, CBO Aug 21 2025 at 3:58PM on page 57
Comment
What is considered affordable housing? This has been discussed my entire career and have never seen it play out.
Warren Colvin, CBO Aug 21 2025 at 3:30PM on page 48
Comment
Should also discuss if Fire districts should play a larger role.
Warren Colvin, CBO Aug 21 2025 at 3:27PM on page 44
Comment
This discussion should also include any fire district.
Warren Colvin, CBO Aug 21 2025 at 3:23PM on page 35
Comment
needs to be compatible with building codes
Warren Colvin, CBO Aug 21 2025 at 3:21PM on page 32
Comment
Needs to take into consideration any fire/emergency vehicle required access
Warren Colvin, CBO Aug 21 2025 at 3:16PM on page 25
Comment
Connex boxes used as structures needs to make sure that the language is compatible with building dept. requirements.
Warren Colvin, CBO Aug 21 2025 at 3:14PM on page 24
Comment
Any reference to tiny home needs to be compatible with Building Codes or reference must comply to building codes.
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:30AM on page 13
Technical Edit
Avoid use of parentheses within parentheses. Consider a well-placed comma.
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:27AM on page 13
Technical Edit
eliminate last comma
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:27AM on page 13
Comment
So true!
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:25AM on page 13
Technical Edit
*one closing parenthesis
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:24AM on page 13
Technical Edit
Don't use preposition "for" twice in succession. Replace one or the other with "on."
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:15AM on page 12
Suggested Revision
Replace "should be grouped together based on" with "organized by" categories...
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:13AM on page 11
Technical Edit
Chapters and Sections do not need to be capitalized in this sentence.
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:12AM on page 11
Question
I don't understand "in values of 10 or 2"... What am i missing?
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:11AM on page 11
Suggested Revision
Replace new with "logical" or "improved"
in reply to Susan H.'s comment
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:08AM on page 11
Technical Edit
or instead of adding to, change to assist a reader "in finding"...
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 9:04AM on page 10
Suggested Revision
Move "sustainable" in front of manner, and drop "that is sustainable and comprehensive" (redundant) from end of sentence.
Reads: ...sustainable manner consistent with the vision.
Reads: ...sustainable manner consistent with the vision.
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 8:58AM on page 9
Suggested Revision
Replace "that will" with "to." I would prefer to see the entire document written in present rather than passive tense.
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 8:56AM on page 9
Suggested Revision
Add possessive apostrophe after respondents'
Would "expectations" be a better term than "desires"?
Would "expectations" be a better term than "desires"?
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 8:54AM on page 9
Suggested Revision
Replace "different" with "diverse"
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 8:49AM on page 8
Technical Edit
Replace 'difficulty' with 'challenges"
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 8:47AM on page 8
Technical Edit
Strike "without the need for" and replace with "avoiding." This section would truly be more understandable if written as two sentences.
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 8:45AM on page 8
Technical Edit
Insert comma
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 8:02AM on page 7
Technical Edit
Consistency in capitalizing (or not) "County"
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 7:55AM on page 7
Technical Edit
Correct spelling: Integration
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 7:53AM on page 6
Technical Edit
Add comma
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 7:48AM on page 5
Comment
Does this Elliott Pollack Housing Assessment and Market Analysis need a contextual reference (Date? Commissioned by?). I'm not sure it's intuitive to most readers.
Linda Buchanan Aug 21 2025 at 7:41AM on page 5
Comment
Agreed
in reply to Joe Huot's comment
Joe Huot Aug 20 2025 at 3:50PM on page 50
Comment
If further clarification is needed Public Works will happily go over existing standards, including the figures related to roadway design and construction.
Joe Huot Aug 20 2025 at 3:33PM on page 13
Comment
This is not appropriate to be under Public Works and should be under Flood Control.
Joe Huot Aug 19 2025 at 10:30PM on page 50
Comment
The County Engineer has historically not supported sidewalks within publicly maintained rights of way.
Joe Huot Aug 19 2025 at 10:28PM on page 50
Comment
These standards have already been established in the County's Road Design Standards.
Joe Huot Aug 19 2025 at 10:26PM on page 50
Comment
Within the last 5 years, Public Works has already established road design standards.
Joe Huot Aug 19 2025 at 10:24PM on page 49
Question
The local road width standard was recently increased in the County Road Design Standards. Going back to a reduced section would benefit who?
View all
Comments
Close